ST Alpha - "Jennifer Aniston on the cover of GQ... sexy or sad?" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 158

Jennifer Aniston on the cover of GQ... sexy or sad?

Posted by Mop (aka rburriel) Dec 11 '08, 12:55

She looks really good for 50.

Raul

Responses:

sexay ! -- nm - Mazujingle Bells Dec 11, 13:21
About 30 times hotter than Jolie. nm - Dignan Dec 11, 12:58
Not quite 40 actually, but I think she looks spectacular. - pmb Dec 11, 12:57 3
- Depends on whether you believe anyone's official age. ;) -- nm - loosilu Dec 11, 12:58 2
  - i'm pretty sure her's is accurate. she's looks her age and she looked her age 15 years ago. -- nm - El Fandie Dec 11, 13:04 1
    - I agree, actually. -- nm - loosilu Dec 11, 13:10
*beats Mop to a pulp* -- nm - JaxSean Dec 11, 12:57
She looks fine. Airbrushed beyond recognition like every other GQ cover. -- nm - loosilu Dec 11, 12:57
I'm ready to motorboat those bad boys. Mmmm...jaxalicious. -- nm - HdnAgnda Dec 11, 12:56
sad? -- nm - TFox Dec 11, 12:56
She looks great but I'm kind of sadden that she has implants. I think she has implants. -- nm - lileve Dec 11, 12:56 3
- Definitely not. nm - Dignan Dec 11, 12:59
- No, she doesn't. And I'd be willing to test that hypothesis. -- nm - JaxSean Dec 11, 12:59
- I don't think she does. -- nm - loosilu Dec 11, 12:57
See B2-10. Sex-ay. -- nm - Rorschach: 03/06/09 Dec 11, 12:56
Same as always...decent looking but WAAAAAAAAY overrated. -- nm - Jim Dec 11, 12:55
Can't it be both? -- nm - Name Withheld By Request Dec 11, 12:55 1
- Yes. Yes it can. -- nm - Mop Dec 11, 12:56

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.