ST Alpha - "i don't know why fixed terms would mean no more non-confidence votes. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

In response to "That's definitely a factor. There's also a bit of laziness involved, I think." by Beryllium

i don't know why fixed terms would mean no more non-confidence votes. -- nm

Posted by Reagen (aka Reagen) Dec 11 '08, 15:58

(No message)

Responses:

Isn't that how the US does it? Four-year election cycles with no chance of disolving congress for another go? -- nm - Beryllium Dec 11, 15:59 5
- well congress is only for two years and isn't tied to the president at all. however - Reagen Dec 11, 16:02 4
  - I thought that the US congress was four years, but 50% of it was offset by two years from the other half? -- nm - Beryllium Dec 11, 16:03 3
    - you're thinking of the senate, which has a third of its member up for election at a time, but has six year terms. -- nm - Reagen Dec 11, 16:04 2
      - Oh, i see. -- nm - Beryllium Dec 11, 16:04 1
        
        It's actually the House and the Senate. Congress is both. - the liioulu with icy sidewalks Dec 11, 16:45

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.