In response to
"well, I'm willing to match up BSU against any in the Pac-10. I gave you two chances to defend the SEC against the Pac-10 and you DUCKed (hi Redmond)"
by
crash davis
|
What I've said -- and you know this yet you pretend otherwise -- is that such a statement is so ludicrous as to not bear discussion.
Posted by
David (aka David)
Oct 11 '10, 12:27
|
Also, "You can't prove that Auburn is the best in the SEC yet" is your incorrect logical inference. I didn't say they were the best in the SEC. I said they were undoubtedly better than Boise State. That's not at all the same.
If Georgia or Kentucky lined up against a Boise State at a neutral site tomorrow, I think oddsmakers would favor both SEC teams...and Kentucky doesn't even have a quarterback. You don't even know what you're arguing at this point. You threw out stupid comments from a lousy columnist and went they got dismissed out of hand for being more nonsense from someone nonsensical, you kept trying to move the goalposts. That's why I'm not taking you seriously.
Finally, you say: "and the coaching at Boise is magnificent" and all I need to say in reply is this. The coach we have that was able to dominate when he was with you has failed to count to 11 three times already this season with UT. It's hard not to laugh about that, because it's just brutally bad luck for you that he could repeatedly fail so completely at something so basic. That's the smoking gun you're never overcoming. My team has a guy who excelled at your university and he's looked like what he is this entire season: a guy recently promoted from the minors who isn't ready for the show yet.
And -none- of this is smack talk.
|
Responses:
|