Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 11:48
2: Dec 2, 08:21
3: Dec 1, 17:33
4: Dec 1, 11:23
5: Nov 30, 15:54
6: Nov 30, 09:41
7: Nov 29, 16:44
8: Nov 29, 08:01
9: Nov 28, 16:19
10: Nov 28, 09:42
11: Nov 27, 18:07
12: Nov 27, 12:04
13: Nov 27, 08:26
14: Nov 26, 18:06
15: Nov 26, 12:05
16: Nov 26, 08:29
17: Nov 25, 18:33
18: Nov 25, 11:12
19: Nov 25, 07:08
20: Nov 24, 13:17
Posts: 161
So, now that I've seen both movies, I'm completely mystified why Brandon Gray of BOM thinks the closest historical predecessor to The Social Network
Posted by
con_carne
Oct 11 '10, 12:34
is 21.
"Its 31 percent dip was also the lowest of the weekend among nationwide holdovers, and it held better than 21 among past similar titles, though that picture still had better attendance."
Huh?
(boxofficemojo.com)
Responses:
both based on books by Ben Mezrich. -- nm
-
Reagen
Oct 11, 12:36
1
This is correct. -- nm
-
David
Oct 11, 12:38
I'm guessing because both films had very similar opening weekend box office. -- nm
-
Inigo
Oct 11, 12:36
1
He uses these comparisons as a BO predictor, though, and they would usually be in place well ahead of the opening -- nm
-
con_carne
Oct 11, 12:39
based on a book about smart college kids making tons of money in fun fashion? (my guess.) -- nm
-
TFox
Oct 11, 12:36
1
I'll buy this. Moving on... :-) -- nm
-
con_carne
Oct 11, 12:43
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.