Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 11:48
2: Dec 2, 08:21
3: Dec 1, 17:33
4: Dec 1, 11:23
5: Nov 30, 15:54
6: Nov 30, 09:41
7: Nov 29, 16:44
8: Nov 29, 08:01
9: Nov 28, 16:19
10: Nov 28, 09:42
11: Nov 27, 18:07
12: Nov 27, 12:04
13: Nov 27, 08:26
14: Nov 26, 18:06
15: Nov 26, 12:05
16: Nov 26, 08:29
17: Nov 25, 18:33
18: Nov 25, 11:12
19: Nov 25, 07:08
20: Nov 24, 13:17
Posts: 159
Did we talk about this? Couple asks surrogate mother to abort fetus because the baby has down's syndrome -- (link)
Posted by
amoxy (aka amoxy)
Oct 11 '10, 13:06
(No message)
I am pro-choice, but I have a problem with this
(www.nationalpost.com)
Responses:
do you think a couple should have the option to abort a fetus that has down's, if the mother is carrying it herself?
-
kare
Oct 11, 13:22
13
I guess my problem is that this couple has put so much into getting a child
-
amoxy
Oct 11, 13:27
12
sorry, but i think that's an ignorant pov. i'm sure their decision was far, far more complex and agonizing than this. -- nm
-
kare
Oct 11, 13:31
11
Really? -- nm
-
amoxy
Oct 11, 13:33
10
i would have had a screening test on friday. i was petrified that something terrible would come up and we'd have to make an agonizing decision
-
kare
Oct 11, 13:39
9
I have been there so just don't -- nm
-
amoxy
Oct 11, 13:42
surely you see the ethical trouble. -- nm
-
Reagen
Oct 11, 13:40
7
[deleted]
All the more reason not to pass judgement.
-
musubi
Oct 11, 13:43
because of the surrogacy? somewhat. far less so if it was not the surrogate's, biologically.
-
kare
Oct 11, 13:42
4
no, because of the issue of "aborting because of defect".
-
Reagen
Oct 11, 13:44
3
So folks might support a woman's right to chose abortion for no reason, but not for that reason? -- nm
-
mara
Oct 11, 13:46
2
i'm sort of blown away. ST break time. laters folks, and amoxy, i'm so sorry if i said anything to hurt you
-
kare
Oct 11, 13:48
supporting someone's right to choose does not mean you have support their reasons for choosing. -- nm
-
Reagen
Oct 11, 13:48
So, you think the couple should be forced to raise the child? -- nm
-
con_carne
Oct 11, 13:11
15
[deleted]
1
this -- nm
-
Spawn
Oct 11, 13:18
If you want to get legal about it, yes. They signed an agreement -- nm
-
amoxy
Oct 11, 13:16
3
[deleted]
"Under the agreement the trio signed, the surrogate�s choice would mean absolving the couple of any responsibility for raising the child." -- nm
-
mara
Oct 11, 13:18
1
I am curious as to the allowed causes for this to be in effect, or could the couple just change their mind for no reason? -- nm
-
znufrii
Oct 11, 13:19
the surrogacy issue itself notwithstanding...
-
znufrii
Oct 11, 13:16
4
wow.
-
kare
Oct 11, 13:23
3
hmmm? -- nm
-
znufrii
Oct 11, 13:25
2
i just can't even begin to fathom where anyone has a right to judge a situation like this
-
kare
Oct 11, 13:29
1
*shrug*
-
znufrii
Oct 11, 13:32
I don't think that's what he's saying. Being pro-choice is being pro-your-choice for your body. Telling/asking someone else to get an abortion
-
Jim
Oct 11, 13:14
Not any more than I think the woman should be forced to have an abortion. If nothing else it should be set up so that the kid can be put up
-
oblique
Oct 11, 13:13
2
[deleted]
1
[deleted]
ugh. -- nm
-
znufrii
Oct 11, 13:11
[deleted]
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.