Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 11, 14:43
2: Dec 11, 11:29
3: Dec 11, 07:59
4: Dec 10, 18:15
5: Dec 10, 12:28
6: Dec 10, 09:30
7: Dec 10, 05:59
8: Dec 9, 17:07
9: Dec 9, 13:47
10: Dec 9, 10:33
11: Dec 9, 07:33
12: Dec 8, 17:50
13: Dec 8, 10:32
14: Dec 8, 06:23
15: Dec 7, 16:52
16: Dec 7, 07:17
17: Dec 6, 14:40
18: Dec 6, 10:07
19: Dec 6, 07:32
20: Dec 5, 19:48
Posts: 156
In response to
"
Among the least surprising news ever: The BCS doesn't care about intergrity, fairness or logical consistancy. (link)
"
by
musubi
but but but... it's better than what we used to have, so let's keep it. -- nm
Posted by
BCS Supporters (aka Rambler14)
Oct 14 '10, 11:01
(No message)
Responses:
That's what's the most frustrating thing to me, it's not better. I'd rather go back to the old nonsense system that the BCS.
-
musubi
Oct 14, 11:03
14
Really? Where we'd have a split championship every 3-4 years because #1 and #2 weren't playing each other? -- nm
-
Strongbad
Oct 14, 11:04
13
Aboslutely, I'd rather have that. The BCS is a mirage that doesn't fix what it claims to. (nm)
-
musubi
Oct 14, 11:09
4
All the BCS has ever claimed to do is match the #1 team against the #2 team in a final game
-
Strongbad
Oct 14, 11:10
3
75?
-
Will Hunting
Oct 14, 11:14
And it's reasoning for doing that is to supposely create a legitimate championship, which it doesn't do. (nm)
-
musubi
Oct 14, 11:12
1
IMO, It creates more of a legit championship that the previous system.
-
Strongbad
Oct 14, 11:22
that just made the other Bowls worth watching. Now unless your team is in the game who cares about the John Hancock Bowls of the world... -- nm
-
Beaker
Oct 14, 11:06
7
right. -- nm
-
Don Homer
Oct 14, 11:08
The John Hancock Bowls aren't going to go away if we scrapped the BCS. -- nm
-
Strongbad
Oct 14, 11:07
5
No, but instead of 1.5 bowls that matter, you could have 7 or 11 depending on the tourney size.
-
Will Hunting
Oct 14, 11:18
4
You'd have more games that matter, yes.
-
Strongbad
Oct 14, 11:20
3
Why would we? I'm not giving every conference a shot here; this ain't March Madness.
-
Will Hunting
Oct 14, 11:23
2
You have to. The Utah, TCU, Boise crowd would force it.
-
Strongbad
Oct 14, 11:24
1
That's the 7th spot...maybe 8th if the WAC isn't dismembered.
-
Will Hunting
Oct 14, 11:26
yeah all that tradition for the Bowl games when every one actaully meant something was terrible -- nm
-
Beaker
Oct 14, 11:02
4
BCS isn't watering down the bowls.
-
Strongbad
Oct 14, 11:05
3
that and with the loss of tradition (Big10/PAC 10 in the Rose), they are all worthless except the Championship Game -- nm
-
Beaker
Oct 14, 11:07
There's 1.5 games that matter anymore.
-
Will Hunting
Oct 14, 11:06
1
It's become the polar opposite of college basketball
-
Strongbad
Oct 14, 11:09
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.