Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 02:38
2: Dec 3, 14:19
3: Dec 3, 11:17
4: Dec 3, 07:33
5: Dec 2, 17:22
6: Dec 2, 11:48
7: Dec 2, 08:21
8: Dec 1, 17:33
9: Dec 1, 11:23
10: Nov 30, 15:54
11: Nov 30, 09:41
12: Nov 29, 16:44
13: Nov 29, 08:01
14: Nov 28, 16:19
15: Nov 28, 09:42
16: Nov 27, 18:07
17: Nov 27, 12:04
18: Nov 27, 08:26
19: Nov 26, 18:06
20: Nov 26, 12:05
Posts: 156
In response to
"
Really? Where we'd have a split championship every 3-4 years because #1 and #2 weren't playing each other? -- nm
"
by
Strongbad
Aboslutely, I'd rather have that. The BCS is a mirage that doesn't fix what it claims to. (nm)
Posted by
musubi
Oct 14 '10, 11:09
I'm not buying the bill of goods that the BCS is selling.
Responses:
All the BCS has ever claimed to do is match the #1 team against the #2 team in a final game
-
Strongbad
Oct 14, 11:10
3
75?
-
Will Hunting
Oct 14, 11:14
And it's reasoning for doing that is to supposely create a legitimate championship, which it doesn't do. (nm)
-
musubi
Oct 14, 11:12
1
IMO, It creates more of a legit championship that the previous system.
-
Strongbad
Oct 14, 11:22
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.