ST Alpha - "or ever, really. It's a consequence of optics. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 152

In response to "at this time -- nm" by crash davis

or ever, really. It's a consequence of optics. -- nm

Posted by Reagen (aka Reagen) Oct 15 '10, 09:20

(No message)

Responses:

at this time, 100 years after Zefram Cochrane we'll be able to pop over there in about an hour snap a cell phone photo and be back in another hour -- nm - crash davis Oct 15, 09:26 5
- Crash, I have something need to tell you about Star Trek... -- nm - Reagen Oct 15, 09:28 4
  - my point being, we'll have telescopes but they won't be stationary/orbital, they'll be on moving platforms - now what about Star Trek? -- nm - crash davis Oct 15, 09:30 3
    - According to Star Trek, Khan was supposed to be in power in 1996 - amoxy Oct 15, 09:35
    - Also, I have some things to tell you about Santa. -- nm - Reagen Oct 15, 09:33 1
      - You're confusing me, man. Santa isn't real. Where are you going with this? -- nm - crash davis Oct 15, 09:34
the better hubble don't use optics :) -- nm - Danedukenuuk Oct 15, 09:23 4
- that sort of defeats his initial request. -- nm - Reagen Oct 15, 09:23 3
  - the real question is about funnyness - Danedukenuuk Oct 15, 09:24 2
    - OK, I guess Hubble 2.0 is going to use your ass as a gravitational lens, then. : ) -- nm - Beryllium Oct 15, 09:25 1
      - yep but hubble 3.9 is installed on the moon (about same size) after the atomic explotion there - Danedukenuuk Oct 15, 09:27

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.