ST Alpha - "spoilers" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 152

In response to "spoilers" by Dano

spoilers

Posted by TFox Oct 16 '10, 22:02

i... disagree.

Show Spoilers

Responses:

It's just so ridiculous, it might as well be Satan anally raping someone with a baseball bat. -- nm - Dano Oct 16, 22:05 10
- oh, that I'd pay to see - mud Oct 16, 22:11
- I actually haven't fully wrapped my head around why this movie is even legal to screen. - TFox Oct 16, 22:09 8
  - Because none of it actually happens? -- nm - Dano Oct 16, 22:12 7
    - The Simpsons don't exist in real life either. I think the law is fairly clear on that point. -- nm - TFox Oct 16, 22:12 6
      - The law does include the phrase "...and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value" because of Supreme Court rulings. -- nm - Dano Oct 16, 22:18 5
        
        right, which is why i assume they focus on "the really important allegory" hidden in there in Q&As. - TFox Oct 16, 22:23 4
        
        (just to clarify a bit: let's say the film as a whole is kosher legally...) - TFox Oct 16, 22:30 2
        
        The only thing I will say is that the allegory is explicitly stated several times by a character in the film. It's not subtle. - Dano Oct 16, 22:47 1
        
        the simpsons porn is illegal in some states as some states call depictions of children engaged in sex,even simulated, even obvious cut and paste kids - zeitgeist Oct 16, 22:55
        
        The allegory is not hidden. Characters in the film explicitly make the connection. -- nm - Dano Oct 16, 22:29

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.