Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 152
so (ALCS spoilers)
Posted by
znufrii
Oct 19 '10, 17:35
what's the use in providing for video review of questionable home run calls if the umps won't use it?
Show Spoilers
Responses:
Can they use it for that? Is fan interference covered? -- nm
-
David
Oct 19, 17:36
8
I guess it was. So, they screwed up. -- nm
-
David
Oct 19, 17:40
6
Should have reviewed it, but Posnanski thinks they got the call right. -- (link)
-
TFox
Oct 19, 17:52
5
If the rule is that interference doesn't exist beyond the fence, they got it right but not reviewing it is moronic. -- nm
-
David
Oct 19, 17:55
4
true, but
-
tRuMaN
Oct 19, 17:57
3
If that's the rule, once Cruz goes over the fence, all bets are off.
-
TFox
Oct 19, 17:58
2
Right, I have a huge problem with the language of that rule. -- nm
-
David
Oct 19, 18:01
1
agreed -- nm
-
tRuMaN
Oct 19, 18:03
fan interfenrence is one of the allowable uses. -- nm
-
tRuMaN
Oct 19, 17:40
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
