ST Alpha - "what no Kepler? Shame on you Reagen." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 160

what no Kepler? Shame on you Reagen.

Posted by loosilu (aka loosilu2) Oct 21 '10, 09:46

I've decided to blame Reagen for that one.

Responses:

I... don't know what you're talking about. -- nm - Reagen Oct 21, 09:48 50
- you had nothing to do with it. it's on b2. I should have blamed Krusty, but you're more fun. -- nm - loosilu Oct 21, 09:49 49
  - I would name more chemists. Bohr, Rutherford, Mendeleev... -- nm - Reagen Oct 21, 10:06
  - A bit of an oversight, oops. I focused mostly on physicists despite my math background. -- nm - Krusty Oct 21, 09:52 47
    - and what's up with the lack of mathematicians? Descartes, Leibniz. -- nm - loosilu Oct 21, 09:54 46
      - I think she was going for people that most people have heard of. - Jim Oct 21, 09:57 42
        
        anyone who took math beyond algebra knows Leibniz. -- nm - loosilu Oct 21, 10:00 35
        
        I like the idea of this because you could say "I'm going into Liebniz to do some notation" -- nm - Reagen Oct 21, 10:12
        
        can't let this go by without reposting this link... -- (link) - znufrii Oct 21, 10:06 1
        
        Ha! :-) -- nm - Krusty Oct 21, 10:09
        
        I took math beyond algebra....I have no clue who did what.... -- nm - Will Hunting Oct 21, 10:06
        
        Techinically, I did (I struggled through advanced algebra) and if Leibniz was mentioned I don't recall him. -- nm - mara Oct 21, 10:03 3
        
        Know what, Ima change my answer. Technically, I didn't. -- nm - mara Oct 21, 10:04 2
        
        since you popped up, you made me think of Gutenberg. -- nm - loosilu Oct 21, 10:05 1
        
        Three Equations and a Baby? -- nm - zork Oct 21, 10:19
        
        If you took calculus you should have heard his name. Amazing genius. -- nm - Krusty Oct 21, 10:03
        
        No, they don't. -- nm - Jim Oct 21, 10:02 25
        
        beyond algebra. You can't take calculus without coming across Leibniz. -- nm - Reagen Oct 21, 10:03 24
        
        And yet...I did. Calc 1-2-3 and Diff EQ. - Jim Oct 21, 10:08 7
        
        This would be like learning about quantum mechanics without hearing the name Schroedinger. -- nm - Reagen Oct 21, 10:09 6
        
        We were too busy learning how the math worked and not who did the math in the first place; in my experience. -- nm - Will Hunting Oct 21, 10:12
        
        Leibniz doesn't have a cat named after him. - musubi Oct 21, 10:11
        
        Again...not saying I didn't hear it. Just saying I don't remember it and that he's not well known. -- nm - Jim Oct 21, 10:10 3
        
        and if *Jim* doesn't remember it it must not be at all culturally significant. - znufrii Oct 21, 10:11 2
        
        Jim's not saying he's not culturally significant though. - musubi Oct 21, 10:14 1
        
        whatever Jim says is right, obvie. -- nm - znufrii Oct 21, 10:19
        
        yeah it's the diff eq's where he really hits....nm - x Oct 21, 10:05 15
        
        thank you. of course he's not obscure. -- nm - loosilu Oct 21, 10:06 14
        
        We have different definitions of obscure then. -- nm - Will Hunting Oct 21, 10:06 13
        
        he and newton basically invented calculus between them. that's pretty big time....nm - x Oct 21, 10:10 11
        
        Yeah.....not saying he's not important....just learning math names wasn't ever important in any of the schooling I did. -- nm - Will Hunting Oct 21, 10:13
        
        He's certainly important, but most people who take high-level math don't retain the subject matter, much less the historical context. - musubi Oct 21, 10:13 8
        
        maybe so. i never went past calc 101, myself....nm - x Oct 21, 10:16
        
        I practically flunked calculus and I know him. -- nm - loosilu Oct 21, 10:13 6
        
        I would wager good money that if you went though my work place, full of engineers, no more than 20% would know who Leibniz is, without some clues. - musubi Oct 21, 10:16 4
        
        all your comp sci guys should know him - he invented binary. -- nm - Reagen Oct 21, 10:18 1
        
        The only comp sci guys in my work place are IT gnomes in the basement. - musubi Oct 21, 10:20
        
        agreed -- nm - zork Oct 21, 10:17
        
        do it. -- nm - loosilu Oct 21, 10:16
        
        Maybe if you spent more time on the math and not who did it, you wouldn't have practically flunked calc. :) -- nm - Will Hunting Oct 21, 10:15
        
        Leibniz also had the benefit of not being a prick. -- nm - Reagen Oct 21, 10:10
        
        Word. -- nm - Jim Oct 21, 10:09
        
        Pythagoras!!!!!!! -- nm - zork Oct 21, 09:58
        
        Yeah, who ever heard of Descartes. -- nm - mara Oct 21, 09:58 4
        
        He's before Dehorse, right? -- nm - Reagen Oct 21, 10:02 3
        
        Boooooooo!! -- nm - Lon_cHaneY Oct 21, 10:04
        
        and you hopped on me for my ruminant joke?....nm - x Oct 21, 10:03 1
        
        booing is a sign of approval for a pun! -- nm - Reagen Oct 21, 10:04
      - and I'd like to nominate Mandelbrot (may he RIP). -- nm - loosilu Oct 21, 09:55 2
        
        I said Pascal who was both an accomplished physicist and mathematician. Here's another and a favorite, Christiaan Huygens. -- nm - Krusty Oct 21, 10:00 1
        
        telescope man! I'm also a fan of Robert Hooke. -- nm - loosilu Oct 21, 10:03
also throw in Watson and Crick, and I think Galen as well. -- nm - loosilu Oct 21, 09:47

Post a message top

what no Kepler? Shame on you Reagen.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.