ST Alpha - "We have different definitions of obscure then. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 160

In response to "thank you. of course he's not obscure. -- nm" by loosilu

We have different definitions of obscure then. -- nm

Posted by Will Hunting (aka JoeMetz) Oct 21 '10, 10:06

(No message)

Responses:

he and newton basically invented calculus between them. that's pretty big time....nm - x Oct 21, 10:10 11
- Yeah.....not saying he's not important....just learning math names wasn't ever important in any of the schooling I did. -- nm - Will Hunting Oct 21, 10:13
- He's certainly important, but most people who take high-level math don't retain the subject matter, much less the historical context. - musubi Oct 21, 10:13 8
  - maybe so. i never went past calc 101, myself....nm - x Oct 21, 10:16
  - I practically flunked calculus and I know him. -- nm - loosilu Oct 21, 10:13 6
    - I would wager good money that if you went though my work place, full of engineers, no more than 20% would know who Leibniz is, without some clues. - musubi Oct 21, 10:16 4
      - all your comp sci guys should know him - he invented binary. -- nm - Reagen Oct 21, 10:18 1
        
        The only comp sci guys in my work place are IT gnomes in the basement. - musubi Oct 21, 10:20
      - agreed -- nm - zork Oct 21, 10:17
      - do it. -- nm - loosilu Oct 21, 10:16
    - Maybe if you spent more time on the math and not who did it, you wouldn't have practically flunked calc. :) -- nm - Will Hunting Oct 21, 10:15
- Leibniz also had the benefit of not being a prick. -- nm - Reagen Oct 21, 10:10
Word. -- nm - Jim Oct 21, 10:09

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.