ST Alpha - "No, my argument was "What's wrong with the concept of families in power, if the families in power are constantly changing"" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 154

No, my argument was "What's wrong with the concept of families in power, if the families in power are constantly changing"

Posted by Beryllium (aka grayman) Dec 15 '08, 11:29

What's the problem with individuals in power, if the individuals in power are constantly changing?

I'm basically just saying, a stagnant dynasty is a monarchy, and a stagnant individual is a dictator.

So, through turnover and growth of the Dynasty "business", the country will stay out of the hands of an individual family, or an individual person, and basically get passed around like a peace pipe to numerous groups of people. Including newbies.

Responses:

[deleted] 4
- No, because you missed the thread where NWBR suggested that Obama's family could be a new dynasty -- nm - Beryllium Dec 15, 11:32 3
  - [deleted] 2
    - But I asked what dynasty Obama was from. And he countered with saying essentially that Obama was starting his own. -- nm - Beryllium Dec 15, 11:37 1
      - [deleted]

Post a message top

No, my argument was "What's wrong with the concept of families in power, if the families in power are constantly changing"

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.