Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 18:10
2: Dec 4, 12:27
3: Dec 4, 09:36
4: Dec 4, 02:38
5: Dec 3, 14:19
6: Dec 3, 11:17
7: Dec 3, 07:33
8: Dec 2, 17:22
9: Dec 2, 11:48
10: Dec 2, 08:21
11: Dec 1, 17:33
12: Dec 1, 11:23
13: Nov 30, 15:54
14: Nov 30, 09:41
15: Nov 29, 16:44
16: Nov 29, 08:01
17: Nov 28, 16:19
18: Nov 28, 09:42
19: Nov 27, 18:07
20: Nov 27, 12:04
Posts: 156
In response to
"
is this separate from the project to replace the current I-5 bridge? -- nm
"
by
znufrii
yes, they want another bridge to alleviate congestion on I-5 and I-205 -- nm
Posted by
Guy (aka lostatlimbo)
Nov 5 '10, 10:54
(No message)
Responses:
I think that's silly.
-
znufrii
Nov 5, 10:55
6
public transit between Portland & Vancouver is a joke.
-
Guy
Nov 5, 10:58
4
iirc, Vancouver voted against getting MAX when they had first planned to bring the Yellow Line there
-
znufrii
Nov 5, 11:01
3
yep. they vote against all of their own transit measures too
-
Guy
Nov 5, 11:03
2
really, they just need to expand Tri-Met to include Vancouver, so there's a unified regional transit strategy. -- nm
-
znufrii
Nov 5, 11:05
1
Tri-Met has pulled way back because Vancouver refuses to fund it
-
Guy
Nov 5, 11:07
YES! that is the only sort of bridge i would support. either add it to an existing bridge or build a transit & pedestrian only bridge -- nm
-
Guy
Nov 5, 10:56
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.