Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 154
In response to
"
Doesn't mean it has been addressed publicly. -- nm
"
by
Mop (217 lbs)
And the notably reserved British tabloids would certainly have ignored it. -- nm
Posted by
Reagen (aka Reagen)
Nov 17 '10, 09:20
(No message)
Responses:
[deleted]
Meh. I thought I'd read the rumor in a British tabloid. -- nm
-
Mop (217 lbs)
Nov 17, 09:21
7
There are lots of sources for the rumor, but if she wasn't baptized or confirmed Catholic, it's a non-issue. If she had been, we'd know by now.
-
mara
Nov 17, 09:23
6
Nope, sorry. Reagen says there is no such rumor. -- nm
-
Mop (217 lbs)
Nov 17, 09:34
2
Yeah, well, Reagen says a lot of things. -- nm
-
mara
Nov 17, 09:34
1
But ML concurred! He *concurred!* -- nm
-
Mop (217 lbs)
Nov 17, 09:43
I think baptized is enough ... -- nm
-
loosilu
Nov 17, 09:26
2
Thus the "or." -- nm
-
mara
Nov 17, 09:34
1
hair-splitting technicality: Can't be confirmed without being baptized. -- nm
-
loosilu
Nov 17, 09:35
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
