Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 18:10
2: Dec 4, 12:27
3: Dec 4, 09:36
4: Dec 4, 02:38
5: Dec 3, 14:19
6: Dec 3, 11:17
7: Dec 3, 07:33
8: Dec 2, 17:22
9: Dec 2, 11:48
10: Dec 2, 08:21
11: Dec 1, 17:33
12: Dec 1, 11:23
13: Nov 30, 15:54
14: Nov 30, 09:41
15: Nov 29, 16:44
16: Nov 29, 08:01
17: Nov 28, 16:19
18: Nov 28, 09:42
19: Nov 27, 18:07
20: Nov 27, 12:04
Posts: 162
hmmm. is 53 inches a realistic or reasonable value for ground displacement after an earthquake?
Posted by
loosilu (aka loosilu2)
Nov 17 '10, 14:26
let's say 7.7
Responses:
the 1906 earthquake caused a displacement of up to 20 feet. -- nm
-
Reagen
Nov 17, 14:30
1
different type, though. I wonder about the 1812 earthquake in the zone I'm looking at. -- nm
-
loosilu
Nov 17, 14:42
I don't think so.
-
mara
Nov 17, 14:29
Sure it is. Of course it is. Why wouldn't it be? -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Nov 17, 14:29
2
Do I look like an earthquakeologist? that's why I'm asking. :P -- nm
-
loosilu
Nov 17, 14:41
*checks my LCD pocket earthquake ground displacement calculator* yep, looks ok to me. -- nm
-
TFox
Nov 17, 14:30
53 inches? *splurt* -- nm
-
Ty97 si
Nov 17, 14:27
4
nubby, please -- nm
-
ty97
Nov 17, 14:27
*demolished* -- nm
-
Katy Perry's vocal cords
Nov 17, 14:27
2
the callback was almost as funny as the original joke. -- nm
-
TFox
Nov 17, 14:29
1
I missed the original joke. But the call back is pretty good -- nm
-
sycor
Nov 17, 14:37
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
