ST Alpha - "And I'm saying after a certain point the onus is on the person not wanting to be spoiled. I'm not treating a 67 year old film as if it was released" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 152

In response to "Nobody's saying you can't talk about it. We're saying when you talk about, keep it in the IM and use spoiler headings. (I don't care about being " by mara

And I'm saying after a certain point the onus is on the person not wanting to be spoiled. I'm not treating a 67 year old film as if it was released

Posted by TWuG Dec 16 '08, 15:54

yesterday.

I wouldn't treat a 5 year old film that way, either.

At some point the person not wanting to be spoiled needs to take responsibility, not expect the world to talk in secret.

Show Spoilers

Responses:

[deleted] 1
- Because what Amy viewed as a spoiler, I viewed as a throwaway. She was right to be offended. Even I wouldn't set a limitation at 24 hours. - TWuG Dec 16, 16:02

Post a message top

And I'm saying after a certain point the onus is on the person not wanting to be spoiled. I'm not treating a 67 year old film as if it was released

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.