Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 08:01
2: Nov 28, 16:19
3: Nov 28, 09:42
4: Nov 27, 18:07
5: Nov 27, 12:04
6: Nov 27, 08:26
7: Nov 26, 18:06
8: Nov 26, 12:05
9: Nov 26, 08:29
10: Nov 25, 18:33
11: Nov 25, 11:12
12: Nov 25, 07:08
13: Nov 24, 13:17
14: Nov 23, 18:13
15: Nov 23, 06:17
16: Nov 22, 13:24
17: Nov 22, 09:09
18: Nov 21, 22:36
19: Nov 21, 14:03
20: Nov 21, 10:18
Posts: 152
Pierce Brosnan's singing, while not very good, was not *nearly* as bad as I thought it would be. Not even close.
Posted by
kelly (aka kelly)
Dec 17 '08, 05:17
I still cringed every time he started singing, though.
Responses:
I haven't seen that movie yet, but similarly: Richard Gere in Chicago. -- nm
-
Don Homer
Dec 17, 05:22
4
I thought Gere was pretty good. -- nm
-
mara
Dec 17, 05:35
3
his was also a part where you can get away with acting the song as much if not moreso than singing it, and it still works.
-
znufrii
Dec 17, 06:08
He was better than Brosnan, that's for sure! -- nm
-
kelly
Dec 17, 05:38
Right, but I still thought he was one of the weaker singers in the movie and I didn't have very high expectations for him. -- nm
-
Don Homer
Dec 17, 05:37
Yeah, I thank TT/ST for lowering my expectations so much. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Dec 17, 05:20
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
