ST Alpha - "(you could actually make an argument that a partially damaged site would have its damage rate increased if hit a second time, but up to you.) -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 158

In response to "ok, I think I will try stacking them first. thanks again. -- nm" by loosilu

(you could actually make an argument that a partially damaged site would have its damage rate increased if hit a second time, but up to you.) -- nm

Posted by TFox Dec 8 '10, 09:17

(No message)

Responses:

that would be logical, but I can't arbitrarily change damage probabilities. If I were running hte actual heavy duty model, I would do that. - loosilu Dec 8, 09:18 2
- not the probability of damage, the extent of the damage. but i agree, its probably too much refinement. -- nm - TFox Dec 8, 09:19 1
  - I think it would change both. In either case, it's beyond my silicon power. -- nm - loosilu Dec 8, 09:20

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.