Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 11:17
2: Dec 3, 07:33
3: Dec 2, 17:22
4: Dec 2, 11:48
5: Dec 2, 08:21
6: Dec 1, 17:33
7: Dec 1, 11:23
8: Nov 30, 15:54
9: Nov 30, 09:41
10: Nov 29, 16:44
11: Nov 29, 08:01
12: Nov 28, 16:19
13: Nov 28, 09:42
14: Nov 27, 18:07
15: Nov 27, 12:04
16: Nov 27, 08:26
17: Nov 26, 18:06
18: Nov 26, 12:05
19: Nov 26, 08:29
20: Nov 25, 18:33
Posts: 150
In response to
"
It seems terribly inconsistant that they'd sell various motion pictures or professionally published books with similiar content. ALSO --
"
by
Qale
I'm not familiar with the content of what Amazon took down. All we know is "incest" is what the authors are claiming
Posted by
TWuG
Dec 16 '10, 13:18
But Amazon has said no more than "violated our guidelines."
Responses:
I know. I'm kind of moving past the current story to an overall perception/case history of Amazon. If you recall they removed mine back in the day...
-
Qale
Dec 16, 13:19
4
Actually, I don't recall. What happened with your book and how was it resolved? -- nm
-
TWuG
Dec 16, 13:22
3
It, along with others with gay content, were removed for a time. It took a few weeks, Amazon eventually blamed it on a hacker that found a way to rig
-
Qale
Dec 16, 13:26
2
Ah, I recall that. I didn't remember you were caught up in it.
-
TWuG
Dec 16, 13:29
1
I certainly have made purchases from Amazon since. But I wouldn't buy a digital copy of a book via them, nor would I publish one again.
-
Qale
Dec 16, 13:31
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.