ST Alpha - "The methods I listed don't require you logging in at twitter.com. You give them your username and password and they bring the tweets to you. Do you " (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 154

In response to "Honestly, I was hoping that there was a way to not have to login to Twitter at all." by Jim

The methods I listed don't require you logging in at twitter.com. You give them your username and password and they bring the tweets to you. Do you

Posted by mara Jan 5 '11, 19:57

use an RSS reader? Do you use an IM aggregator? Do you use Outlook?

I think one of those would be the easiest, if you're already using one of them.

If you're following people you don't want to read, unfollow them. Then we can figure out a way to get the ones you follow sent to you.

Responses:

Either that, or just point your browser to twitter.com/johnelway or whatever his name is, and read what's there. No log in is required. But you'd have - mara Jan 5, 19:59 4
- this is how i use twitter -- nm - TFox Jan 5, 20:03 3
  - This is probably what I'll do as well, I guess. I don't know what any of that other shit is, except Outlook - Jim Jan 5, 20:05 2
    - Sounds good. However, keep mind that if you make "daily rounds" of a variety of bookmarks to check for updates or new content, an RSS reader might - mara Jan 5, 20:08 1
      - save you some time, I mean. -- nm - mara Jan 5, 20:10

Post a message top

The methods I listed don't require you logging in at twitter.com. You give them your username and password and they bring the tweets to you. Do you

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.