Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 159
In response to
"
really?
"
by
Beryllium
I'm just saying that until you factor in the overall percentage of helmet usage and factor out fatalities that would have been fatalities anyhow...
Posted by
Name Withheld By Request (aka BlueKopo)
Dec 22 '08, 15:22
...That throwing 95% out there doesn't really mean anything. It would be like me saying that 100% of those 40 wearing helmets died, so clearly helmets must have been the cause.
Responses:
common sense test.
-
loosilu
Dec 22, 15:25
3
No, it is likely far higher I would think. That said, my argument is not that helmets don't cut down on injuries.
-
Name Withheld By Request
Dec 22, 15:29
2
theres
-
loosilu
Dec 22, 15:31
1
Who's been arguing that they aren't safer? Let's not confuse putting numbers into perspective (ala Bery's 95%) and denial that they work at all.
-
Name Withheld By Request
Dec 22, 15:37
Statistics on their own don't mean anything. They just suggest things. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Dec 22, 15:23
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.