In response to
"You believe 100% of those deaths were non-preventable?"
by
Will Hunting
|
No. As said below, it just doesn't provide a sound number for comparison is all. As far as your IM...
|
That's where you and I will have to disagree. I don't subscribe to the "If it saves just one life, it must be worth it," school of thought. That's how we end up with a lot of nuisance changes that doesn't always make a lot of sense when compared to the risk.
(Think third base coaches wearing helmets now as a good kneejerk reaction to a fluke accident.)
|
Responses:
|