Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 151
$60 for a 100GB data cap is silly. Adding $1 per gig beyond that is sillier. nm
Posted by
Dignan (aka Dignan)
Feb 8 '11, 15:03
bandwidth costs are falling, not rising.
Responses:
Yes, this I can get the outrage for, as I said. -- nm
-
Reagen
Feb 8, 15:20
bandwidth costs can fall... but the demand for it can rise much faster -- nm
-
stewie
Feb 8, 15:05
6
Shaw isn't buying bandwidth from anyone but their own Bigpipe service. The UBB is a lie. -- nm
-
Beryllium (iPhone)
Feb 8, 15:11
It's a cash grab. nm
-
Dignan
Feb 8, 15:07
4
I'm not commenting on the specifics of that plan, but it's inevitable that you pay for how much you use
-
stewie
Feb 8, 15:09
3
I think throttle-based billing ought to be sufficient. That's what my position is.
-
Beryllium (iPhone)
Feb 8, 15:15
2
I think the net neutrality issue will force it to metered... which is easier to clearly define anyway
-
stewie
Feb 8, 15:19
(I'd call it Pay-As-You-Burst) -- nm
-
Beryllium (iPhone)
Feb 8, 15:17
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
