Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 151
In response to
"
ST lawyers, is there notable court case history addressing a claim of "the contract should be void because I didn't read it even though I signed it"? -- nm
"
by
Max
Google the term "Contracts of Adhesion".
Posted by
pmb (aka pmb)
Feb 8 '11, 15:07
This is probably what you're getting at. They tend to be very fact specific and really are only nullified if they are unconscionable.
Responses:
i think max probably signed a piece of paper without even looking at it and now he's somebody's indentured servant -- nm
-
cupixie
Feb 8, 15:11
1
I thought he thought I was someone famous and I believed it. -- nm
-
Max
Feb 8, 15:13
"If you fall from this I-beam to your death 20 stories below, you don't get to sue us." -- nm
-
Krazy Glue
Feb 8, 15:09
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.