ST Alpha - "NY Times says Army will take over, not VP. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 154

In response to "To be replaced by the VP, a guy who is just as hated, IIRC. Okay. -- nm" by con_carne

NY Times says Army will take over, not VP. -- nm

Posted by loosilu (aka loosilu2) Feb 10 '11, 08:08

(No message)

Responses:

Andrea Mitchell just said the Army was going to force him out... - Remlik Feb 10, 08:11 11
- how would they force him out without taking over? -- nm - loosilu Feb 10, 08:12 1
  - well they could force him out and install someone... -- nm - Remlik Feb 10, 08:15
- this will make things much better I am sure..... -- nm - Beaker Feb 10, 08:11 8
  - As Americanadians, we can't conceive of such a scenario as the military forcing a coup. - con_carne Feb 10, 08:15
  - I think it will. People like the Army. -- nm - loosilu Feb 10, 08:13 6
    - yup, a coup led by the army has never gone wrong -- nm - Beaker Feb 10, 08:27 5
      - The rest of us will get our commentary from people whose knowledge of world politics doesn't begin and end with rewatches of Moon Over Parador -- nm - con_carne Feb 10, 08:32 4
        
        so you really don't think an army led removal of a leader is a dangerous thing? wow. -- nm - Beaker Feb 10, 08:36 3
        
        *Potentially* dangerous, yes. Guaranteed dangerous? No. -- nm - TWuG Feb 10, 08:44
        
        In the case of Egypt, that ship sailed long ago. -- nm - con_carne Feb 10, 08:43
        
        no one is saying that. but it beats people rioting in the streets. -- nm - loosilu Feb 10, 08:41

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.