ST Alpha - "I don't think children's 'literature' was hurting. Books that appealed to children *and* their parents is what Rowling reintroduced. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 157

In response to "I would have thought children's literature was dead, then Harry Potter came along. -- nm" by loosilu

I don't think children's 'literature' was hurting. Books that appealed to children and their parents is what Rowling reintroduced. -- nm

Posted by Dr.Vermin (aka Dr.Vermin) Feb 10 '11, 11:09

(No message)

Responses:

in terms of a single series with huge numbers of fans? nothing came close. -- nm - loosilu Feb 10, 11:11 3
- Because parents and other adults weren't buying copies too. - Dr.Vermin Feb 10, 11:21 1
  - For sure. There are huge children's books out now, that people who don't have kids wouldn't know about. - Amy Feb 10, 11:24
- just because it wasn't doing massive numbers doesn't mean it was dead. just sort of invisible. -- nm - zork Feb 10, 11:16

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.