ST Alpha - "Well, "not *very* physically attracted" doesn't quite = "repulsed", but..." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

In response to "So she's repulsed by him enough to not want to have sex with him, but wants to marry him? Uh, that's bad, hmkay. -- nm" by JaxSean

Well, "not very physically attracted" doesn't quite = "repulsed", but...

Posted by Dr.Vermin (aka Dr.Vermin) Feb 11 '11, 10:30

Maybe the girl has been brainwashed by SATC to think that she's not supposed to settle for anyone who doesn't make her panties wet every time he walks in the door.

Responses:

yup. exactly the type of "cuturally informed" priority I refer to below. -- nm - znufrii Feb 11, 10:34 1
- Glad we agree. Also, from the other day.... - Dr.Vermin Feb 11, 10:36
before we jump to that conclusion, I totally understand. There are plenty of guys who are not repulsive, but are still not sexually attractive. -- nm - loosilu Feb 11, 10:31 4
- and women, as a rule, don't tend to marry guys who they see in that way -- nm - cupixie Feb 11, 10:34 3
  - you think so? I disagree. -- nm - loosilu Feb 11, 10:36 2
    - That's right. They marry the safe guy and secretly bang the hot doormen. -- nm - Max Feb 11, 10:39 1
      - if they hear the clock ticking, they'll totally marry the safe guy. - loosilu Feb 11, 10:41

Post a message top

Well, "not *very* physically attracted" doesn't quite = "repulsed", but...

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.

Well, "not very physically attracted" doesn't quite = "repulsed", but...