Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 16:19
2: Nov 28, 09:42
3: Nov 27, 18:07
4: Nov 27, 12:04
5: Nov 27, 08:26
6: Nov 26, 18:06
7: Nov 26, 12:05
8: Nov 26, 08:29
9: Nov 25, 18:33
10: Nov 25, 11:12
11: Nov 25, 07:08
12: Nov 24, 13:17
13: Nov 23, 18:13
14: Nov 23, 06:17
15: Nov 22, 13:24
16: Nov 22, 09:09
17: Nov 21, 22:36
18: Nov 21, 14:03
19: Nov 21, 10:18
20: Nov 21, 07:35
Posts: 165
In response to
"
I don't understand this methdology. -- nm
"
by
ty97
Here's a link (no cheating) PDF has more methodology information -- (link)
Posted by
Strongbad (aka Rambler14)
Feb 24 '11, 10:39
(No message)
http://www.taxfoundation.org/taxdata/show/27063.html
(www.taxfoundation.org)
Responses:
Maybe I should say I don't understand the point of using this methodology.
-
ty97
Feb 24, 10:42
6
You have it backwards.
-
spamlet
Feb 24, 10:54
3
I'm still not getting it - let me explain what I'm missing better.
-
ty97
Feb 24, 11:00
2
It's confusing to non-tax types, but they mean the income of all the state's residents.
-
spamlet
Feb 24, 11:06
I think it is the aggregate income of all the state's residents
-
znufrii
Feb 24, 11:01
cause taxes are BAD! -- nm
-
moles
Feb 24, 10:46
1
I think studies about taxes and their impacts make sense. I'm (honestly) trying to understand how this specific study helps.
-
ty97
Feb 24, 10:48
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.