Backboards: 
Posts: 155
In response to "Spoilers" by David, Techno-Optimist

I don't think that's true. I think it was a short term decision.

When you've lost and you want someone to blame, the guy who shook the other team's hand seems like an easy target. But in hindsight when you're still losing and realize he could have been an asset to challenges, and he isn't a take-charge, rock-the-boat kind of guy, you'll welcome him back to stay. I think we even heard comments to that effect last night.

Responses:
Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.