|
In response to
"And it's still not about that. It's about his history in this area and whether or not he stays in power."
by
the liioulu with lots less
|
but he has two options if he wins: sell or not sell.
Posted by
Reagen
Mar 17 '11, 18:52
|
One is status quo ante bellum regardless of who he sells to, while the other harms him considerably at the time he can least afford it, and in addition has been shown to be not all that bad for the world. If it's part of anyone's rationale, it's acting on something that's proven to be ineffective.
|
Responses:
|